Jui-Chen Hung vs Connor Farren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Hung vs C. Farren

Jui-Chen Hung
TPE
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
35
Age
31
-
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
868
C. Rank
894
596
Best Rank
685
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$935
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Connor Farren
USA
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
35
Age
31
-
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
868
C. Rank
894
596
Best Rank
685
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$935
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Hung 1 - 1 Farren
They have played 6 sets in total, with Jui-Chen Hung winning 3 and Connor Farren winning 3. The last match between Jui-Chen Hung and Connor Farren was at the China F9, 31-05-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jui-Chen Hung getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hung | 1 |
| Farren | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) China F9(05-31-16)
Jui-Chen Hung
2
6
6
Connor Farren
6
3
4
(R1) China F8(05-24-16)
Connor Farren
4
7
6
Jui-Chen Hung
6
5
4
J. Hung vs C. Farren H2H Profile
J. Hung vs C. Farren Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jui-Chen Hung has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Connor Farren has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jui-Chen Hung, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Connor Farren has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jui-Chen Hung has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Connor Farren has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jui-Chen Hung has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/1), with Connor Farren winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jui-Chen Hung has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 18/21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 11% (W/L 1/8). Connor Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 191/191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/8).
- Player level: In the last year, Jui-Chen Hung has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1), where as Connor Farren has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jui-Chen Hung winning 1 times and Connor Farren being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Jui-Chen Hung winning 3 and Connor Farren winning 3.
- The last match between Jui-Chen Hung and Connor Farren was at the China F9, 31-05-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jui-Chen Hung getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jui-Chen Hung and Connor Farren have played a deciding set 2 times, with Jui-Chen Hung winning 1 times and Connor Farren 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jui-Chen Hung has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Connor Farren has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jui-Chen Hung has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Connor Farren has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jui-Chen Hung has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Connor Farren has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jui-Chen Hung vs Connor Farren Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Hung vs C. Farren H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 29 | Games Won | 30 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 20 |
| 2:25:0 | Average Match Time | 2:25:0 |
| 71% (150/210) | 1st Serve % | 56% (102/181) |
| 62% (93/150) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (72/102) |
| 48% (29/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (35/79) |
| 50% (8/16) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (9/24) |
| 41% (74/181) | Return Points Win % | 42% (88/210) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hung 0%, Farren 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hung 0%, Farren 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Hung 0%, Farren 0%.
J. Hung Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-2 10-8 | ||
Q1 | W | 3-6 6-4 10-4 | ||
C. Farren Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||

J. Hung vs C. Farren Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41.00% (123/177) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.31% (200/214) |
| 42.01% (289/399) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.57% (463/471) |
| 47.58% (2977/3280) | Games Win/Loss | 50.83% (4386/4242) |
| 42.11% (104/143) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (191/191) |
| 46.15% (18/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 7.14% (1/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 241 | Aces Total | 1111 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 267 | Total Double Faults | 1338 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:1:1 |
| 520 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.35 |
| 66% (5124/7796) | 1st Serve % | 57% (9307/16251) |
| 62% (3177/5124) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (6394/9307) |
| 48% (1287/2672) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3215/6944) |
| 42% (298/711) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (668/1674) |
| 39% (2891/7496) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6474/16382) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 28.95% (11/27) | Challenger W/L | 28.13% (9/23) |
| 42.46% (107/145) | Futures W/L | 50.13% (191/190) |
| 40% (114/286) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (200/412) |
| 56% (5/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (28/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (46/101) |
| 48% (39/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (44/105) |
| 80% (122/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (211/175) |
| 20% (122/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (211/35) |
| 13% (178/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (203/25) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 19/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 0-0
12:00
H2H 0-0
12:00
H2H 0-0